Elegir un patrón de acceso a datos

2.5.x ✅ 4.0.x ✅

¿Qué patrón debo usar? Este árbol de decisión lo ayuda a elegir entre controladores directos, patrón de repositorio, capa de servicio y CQRS.

---

Quick Decision Tree

flowchart TD
    START([Start Here]) --> Q1{How complex is<br/>your module?}

    Q1 -->|Simple CRUD<br/>1-3 entities| Q2{Need testing<br/>or mocking?}
    Q1 -->|Moderate<br/>4-10 entities| Q3{Multiple data<br/>sources?}
    Q1 -->|Complex<br/>10+ entities| Q4{High traffic or<br/>read/write asymmetry?}

    Q2 -->|No| HANDLER[✅ Direct Handler]
    Q2 -->|Yes| REPO[✅ Repository Pattern]

    Q3 -->|No, just DB| REPO
    Q3 -->|Yes, APIs/cache| SERVICE[✅ Service Layer]

    Q4 -->|No| SERVICE
    Q4 -->|Yes, need<br/>separate scaling| CQRS[✅ CQRS Pattern]

    HANDLER --> DONE([Choose Pattern])
    REPO --> DONE
    SERVICE --> DONE
    CQRS --> DONE

    style HANDLER fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32
    style REPO fill:#bbdefb,stroke:#1565c0
    style SERVICE fill:#fff9c4,stroke:#f9a825
    style CQRS fill:#ffcdd2,stroke:#c62828

---

Pattern Comparison

Criteria	Direct Handler	Repository	Service Layer	CQRS
Complexity	⭐	⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Testability	❌ Hard	✅ Good	✅ Great	✅ Great
Flexibility	❌ Low	✅ Medium	✅ High	✅ Very High
XOOPS 2.5.x	✅ Native	✅ Works	✅ Works	⚠️ Complex
XOOPS 4.0	⚠️ Deprecated	✅ Recommended	✅ Recommended	✅ For scale
Team Size	1 dev	1-3 devs	2-5 devs	5+ devs
Maintenance	❌ Higher	✅ Moderate	✅ Lower	⚠️ Requires expertise

---

When to Use Each Pattern

✅ Direct Handler (XoopsPersistableObjectHandler)

Best for: Simple modules, quick prototypes, learning XOOPS

// Simple and direct - good for small modules
$handler = xoops_getModuleHandler('article', 'news');
$articles = $handler->getObjects(new Criteria('status', 1));

Choose this when:

• Building a simple module with 1-3 database tables
• Creating a quick prototype
• You’re the only developer and don’t need tests
• The module won’t grow significantly

Limitations:

• Hard to unit test (global dependency)
• Tight coupling to XOOPS database layer
• Business logic tends to leak into controllers

---

✅ Repository Pattern

Best for: Most modules, teams wanting testability

// Abstraction allows mocking for tests
interface ArticleRepositoryInterface {
    public function findPublished(): array;
    public function save(Article $article): void;
}

class XoopsArticleRepository implements ArticleRepositoryInterface {
    private $handler;

    public function __construct() {
        $this->handler = xoops_getModuleHandler('article', 'news');
    }

    public function findPublished(): array {
        return $this->handler->getObjects(new Criteria('status', 1));
    }
}

Choose this when:

• You want to write unit tests
• You might change data sources later (DB → API)
• Working with 2+ developers
• Building modules for distribution

Upgrade path: This is the recommended pattern for XOOPS 4.0 preparation.

---

✅ Service Layer

Best for: Modules with complex business logic

// Service coordinates multiple repositories and contains business rules
class ArticlePublicationService {
    public function __construct(
        private ArticleRepositoryInterface $articles,
        private NotificationServiceInterface $notifications,
        private CacheInterface $cache
    ) {}

    public function publish(int $articleId): void {
        $article = $this->articles->find($articleId);
        $article->setStatus('published');
        $article->setPublishedAt(new DateTime());

        $this->articles->save($article);
        $this->notifications->notifySubscribers($article);
        $this->cache->invalidate("article:{$articleId}");
    }
}

Choose this when:

• Operations span multiple data sources
• Business rules are complex
• You need transaction management
• Multiple parts of the app do the same thing

Upgrade path: Combine with Repository for a robust architecture.

---

⚠️ CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation)

Best for: High-scale modules with read/write asymmetry

// Commands modify state
class PublishArticleCommand {
    public function __construct(
        public readonly int $articleId,
        public readonly int $publisherId
    ) {}
}

// Queries read state (can use denormalized read models)
class GetPublishedArticlesQuery {
    public function __construct(
        public readonly int $limit = 10
    ) {}
}

Choose this when:

• Reads vastly outnumber writes (100:1 or more)
• You need different scaling for reads vs writes
• Complex reporting/analytics requirements
• Event sourcing would benefit your domain

Warning: CQRS adds significant complexity. Most XOOPS modules don’t need it.

---

Recommended Upgrade Path

flowchart LR
    H0["Direct Handler<br/>(XOOPS 2.5.x today)"]
    R["Repository Pattern<br/>(Recommended next step)"]
    S["+ Service Layer<br/>(When complexity grows)"]
    C["+ CQRS<br/>(Only if scaling requires)"]

    H0 -->|"Step 1"| R
    R -->|"Step 2"| S
    S -->|"Step 3<br/>(rare)"| C

    style H0 fill:#ffcdd2
    style R fill:#c8e6c9
    style S fill:#bbdefb
    style C fill:#fff9c4

Step 1: Wrap Handlers in Repositories (2-4 hours)

1. Create an interface for your data access needs
2. Implement it using the existing handler
3. Inject the repository instead of calling xoops_getModuleHandler() directly

Step 2: Add Service Layer When Needed (1-2 days)

1. When business logic appears in controllers, extract to a Service
2. Service uses repositories, not handlers directly
3. Controllers become thin (route → service → response)

Step 3: Consider CQRS Only If (rare)

1. You have millions of reads per day
2. Read and write models are significantly different
3. You need event sourcing for audit trails
4. You have a team experienced with CQRS

---

Quick Reference Card

Question	Answer
”I just need to save/load data”	Direct Handler
”I want to write tests”	Repository Pattern
”I have complex business rules”	Service Layer
”I need to scale reads separately”	CQRS
”I’m preparing for XOOPS 4.0”	Repository + Service Layer

---

Related Documentation

• Repository Pattern Guide
• Service Layer Pattern Guide
• CQRS Pattern Guide (advanced)
• Hybrid Mode Contract

---

#patterns #data-access #decision-tree #best-practices #xoops