Directives de Demande de Tirage

Ce document fournit des directives complètes pour soumettre des demandes de tirage aux projets XOOPS. Suivre ces directives assure des révisions de code fluides et des délais de fusion plus rapides.

Before Creating a Pull Request

Step 1: Check for Existing Issues

1. Visit the GitHub repository
2. Go to Issues tab
3. Search for existing issues related to your change
4. Check both open and closed issues

Step 2: Fork and Clone the Repository

# Fork the repository on GitHub
# Click "Fork" button on the repository page

# Clone your fork
git clone https://github.com/YOUR_USERNAME/XOOPS.git
cd XOOPS

# Add upstream remote
git remote add upstream https://github.com/XOOPS/XOOPS.git

# Verify remotes
git remote -v
# Should show: origin (your fork) and upstream (official)

Step 3: Create a Feature Branch

# Update main branch
git fetch upstream
git checkout main
git merge upstream/main

# Create feature branch
# Use descriptive names: bugfix/issue-number or feature/description
git checkout -b bugfix/123-fix-database-connection
git checkout -b feature/add-psr-7-support

Step 4: Make Your Changes

# Make changes to your files
# Follow code style guidelines

# Stage changes
git add .

# Commit with clear message
git commit -m "Fix database connection timeout issue"

# Create multiple commits for logical changes
git commit -m "Add connection retry logic"
git commit -m "Improve error messages for debugging"

Commit Message Standards

Good Commit Messages

Use clear, descriptive messages following these patterns:

# Format
<type>: <subject>

<body>

<footer>

# Example 1: Bug fix
fix: resolve database connection timeout

Add exponential backoff retry mechanism to database connection.
Connections now retry up to 3 times with increasing delays.

Fixes #123

# Example 2: Feature
feat: implement PSR-7 HTTP message interfaces

Implement Psr\Http\Message interfaces for request/response handling.
Provides type-safe HTTP message handling across the framework.

BREAKING CHANGE: Updated RequestHandler signature

Commit Type Categories

Type	Description	Example
`feat`	New feature	`feat: add user dashboard widget`
`fix`	Bug fix	`fix: resolve cache invalidation bug`
`docs`	Documentation	`docs: update API reference`
`style`	Code style (no logic change)	`style: format imports`
`refactor`	Code refactoring	`refactor: simplify service layer`
`perf`	Performance improvement	`perf: optimize database queries`
`test`	Test changes	`test: add integration tests`
`chore`	Build/tooling changes	`chore: update dependencies`

Pull Request Description

PR Template

## Description
Clear description of changes made and why.

## Type of Change
- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] New feature
- [ ] Breaking change
- [ ] Documentation update

## Related Issues
Closes #123
Related to #456

## Changes Made
- Change 1
- Change 2
- Change 3

## Testing
- [ ] Tested locally
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] Added new tests
- [ ] Manual testing steps included

## Checklist
- [ ] Code follows style guidelines
- [ ] Self-review completed
- [ ] Comments added for complex logic
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] No new warnings generated
- [ ] Added tests for new functionality
- [ ] All tests passing

Code Quality Requirements

Code Style

Follow Code-Style guidelines:

<?php
// Good: PSR-12 style
namespace MyModule\Controller;

use MyModule\Model\Item;
use MyModule\Repository\ItemRepository;

class ItemController
{
    private ItemRepository $repository;

    public function __construct(ItemRepository $repository)
    {
        $this->repository = $repository;
    }

    public function indexAction()
    {
        $items = $this->repository->findAll();
        return $this->render('items', ['items' => $items]);
    }
}

Testing Requirements

Unit Tests

namespace Tests\Feature;

use PHPUnit\Framework\TestCase;
use Xoops\Database\XoopsDatabase;

class DatabaseConnectionTest extends TestCase
{
    private XoopsDatabase $database;

    protected function setUp(): void
    {
        $this->database = new XoopsDatabase();
    }

    public function testConnectionWithValidCredentials()
    {
        $result = $this->database->connect();
        $this->assertTrue($result);
    }

    public function testConnectionWithInvalidCredentials()
    {
        $this->database->setCredentials('invalid', 'invalid');
        $result = $this->database->connect();
        $this->assertFalse($result);
    }
}

Running Tests

# Run all tests
vendor/bin/phpunit

# Run specific test file
vendor/bin/phpunit tests/Feature/DatabaseConnectionTest.php

# Run with coverage
vendor/bin/phpunit --coverage-html coverage/

Working with Branches

Keep Branch Updated

# Fetch latest from upstream
git fetch upstream

# Rebase on latest main
git rebase upstream/main

# Or merge if you prefer
git merge upstream/main

# Force push if rebased (warning: only on your branch!)
git push -f origin bugfix/123-fix-database-connection

Creating the Pull Request

PR Title Format

[Type] Short description (fix/feature/docs)

Examples:
- [FIX] Resolve database connection timeout issue (#123)
- [FEATURE] Implement PSR-7 HTTP message interfaces
- [DOCS] Update API reference for Criteria class

Code Review Process

What Reviewers Look For

Correctness
- Does the code solve the stated problem?
- Are edge cases handled?
- Is error handling appropriate?
Quality
- Does it follow coding standards?
- Is it maintainable?
- Is it well-tested?
Performance
- Any performance regressions?
- Are queries optimized?
- Is memory usage reasonable?
Security
- Input validation?
- SQL injection prevention?
- Authentication/authorization?

Responding to Feedback

# Address feedback
# Edit files based on review comments

# Commit changes
git commit -m "Address code review feedback

- Add additional error handling
- Improve test coverage for edge cases
- Update documentation"

# Push changes
git push origin bugfix/123-fix-database-connection

Common PR Issues and Solutions

Issue 1: PR is Too Large

Problem: Reviewers can’t review massive PRs effectively

Solution: Break into smaller PRs

First PR: Core changes
Second PR: Tests
Third PR: Documentation

Issue 2: No Tests Included

Problem: Reviewers can’t verify functionality

Solution: Add comprehensive tests before submitting

Issue 3: Conflicts with Main

Problem: Your branch is out of sync with main

Solution: Rebase on latest main

git fetch upstream
git rebase upstream/main
git push -f origin your-branch

After Merge

Cleanup

# Switch to main
git checkout main

# Update main
git pull upstream main

# Delete local branch
git branch -d bugfix/123-fix-database-connection

# Delete remote branch
git push origin --delete bugfix/123-fix-database-connection

Best Practices Summary

Do’s

Create descriptive commit messages
Make focused, single-purpose PRs
Include tests for new functionality
Update documentation
Reference related issues
Keep PR descriptions clear
Respond promptly to reviews

Don’ts

Include unrelated changes
Merge main into your branch (use rebase)
Force push after review starts
Skip tests
Submit work in progress
Ignore code review feedback

Documentation Connexe

../Contributing - Aperçu de la contribution
Code-Style - Directives de style de code
../../03-Module-Development/Best-Practices/Testing - Meilleures pratiques de test
../Architecture-Decisions/ADR-Index - Directives architecturales

Ressources

Dernière Mise à Jour: 2026-01-31 S’applique À: Tous les projets XOOPS Dépôt: https://github.com/XOOPS/XOOPS